SHOULD VEGANS STAY AWAY FROM DOCTORS, DRUGS, AND MEDICAL PROCEDURES?
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009 at
3:21 pm
I ask this subject since most on here have been discerning to contend which animals have been off boundary when it comes to contrast or precision healing professionals.
Related posts:
- WHAT DETERMINES THE RATE OF ADOPTION OF TECHNOLOGY IN HEALTH CARE? SEAN NICHOLSON INVESTIGATES HOW RAPIDLY PHYSICIANS ADOPT NEW MEDICAL PROCEDURES, DRUGS, AND DEVICES.: AN ARTICLE FROM: HUMAN ECOLOGY Product DescriptionThis digital request is an essay from Human...
- LOSE WEIGHT NOW . . . STAY SLIM FOREVER. How To Lose Weight Without Diets, Drugs, Or Surgery....
- WHAT MEDICAL PROCEDURES TARGET OBESITY? besides diet pills, how else can people “cure” plumpness on...
- WHO SHOULD BE RESPONIBLE FOR MEDICAL PROCEDURES? Here’s an e.g. situation. A alloy is stranded with dual...
- LOOK FOR STRESS, PTSD AFTER MEDICAL PROCEDURES. : AN ARTICLE FROM: PEDIATRIC NEWS Product DescriptionThis digital request is an essay from Pediatric...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Tagged with: Away • doctors • drugs • from • medical • Procedures • Should • Stay • Vegans
Filed under: Endoscopy
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
It’s really up to them. Yes Nature can offer us a lot, but without all the new medical treatments life expectancy would be much lower, and people in general would be at higher risk of serious consequences when getting something as simple as a cold. (Think back to times before medical technology. ) It comes down to the question of “What’s more important, proper treatment of animals, or my health?”
No. doctors& #039; the works are to help him. and I& #039; d has definitively something matter proven in animal that the human beings, wouldn& #039; Ât you?
I totally differ with the abuse animal, but in a certain point you must take one decisià ³ n. they are animals& #039; Âlives worthy of equals that humans& #039;? i don& #039; t thinks so.
There are no easy answers. The law requires that medications be tested on animals, with no requirement that it be tested on non-medical items. I’d like to see science work toward obviating animal testing, but that’s a long way off.
And if medication is necessary to save someone’s life, that person should take the medication.
No.
Being a vegan doesn’t mean being a martyr; it means doing all you can to minimise your personal contribution to animal suffering and exploitation. Sacrificing your health or your life is not required.
In cases of serious, life-threatening illness or accident, refusing medication is not vegan, it is stupid.
I asked yesterday what people would do in those circumstances. Interestingly, none of the people who usually say they are against all animal testing replied:http://answers. yahoo. com/question/index;…
I& #039; of m some veganos sure do, only I don& #039; t thinks it& #039; necessary s.
They must the ones that support the human rights rejected to lead in the ways that were constructed by the slaves? The reality is, many things in our society happened with the operation of others.
You can be that she finds this interesting one: http://ar. vegnews. of org/de refrain_from_drugsâ ¦
no. Vegans have their different reasons for being vegan, not just animal testing. My reason for becoming a vegan, for example, was that I became allergic to animal products and all meats.
They must yes if they are truth veganos, much medication take control of the animal ingredients, the gelatin becomes the animal of the form and it& #039; s in many meds. Most of vegano or we do not have to remain far from doctors and the medical procedures and meds, go all natural ones. The mother nature must give all us what we needed to be healthy, as soon as uses what she gave us and to shutdown destroyed who it.